Angelia asked:


Getting physical meaning have sex. Why? ? cos sex? important? I find it stimulating intellectectual cos? so pi? erotic medical physical. ? this bizarre?

eroticohio asked:


The? m. of? AI hopes that for some thoughtful answers that go beyond the traditional conservative views that identify the desire to sin, but I already know you are going to say that erotic desire is only acceptable within the context of | but the? marriageâ of the other party would ask: Is it sinful to believe that erotic desire for someone you are dating? These are the erotic fantasies right? If you are basing your views on the Bible (or other holy books), please refer to the sacred scriptures for support your points of view. I think you are really important to the Christian belief that Jesus is a virgin? For him it was impossible to be the son of the god if he had been married? Why? If sex union is a gift from god, why? Jesus del t? couldn of receiving this gift? Is there any reason why? t of? of shouldn of Jesus felt erotic desires for women during his life? ? m. of? IA is not surprised that most answers followed? reasonably traditional? â views more or less level of erotic desire with sin, or as a distraction from our most important route witty. I am disappointed that, even if the application was open for several days, yet no one has ascended to offer a sex-positive. I think that the oppression of women and the devaluation of erotic energy are connected. The traditional view suggests that erotic desire is in conflict with spirituality. I think this is the result of males in ancient history (actually starting in prehistory) deciding that they had to control female sexuality in order to ensure patrilineal respectable. ? t of? cana of you simply Patriarchy unless you ensure that women stay sexually monogamous with their men. (In order of Patriarchy, the matter? Of t? Doesn if the men are sleeping around.) That is, there is a conflict between female erotic desire and Patriarchy. The result was a devaluation of everything feminine and the linking of monogamy to spirituality in such a way that erotic desire in general has turned into a result of the fall? of? from the Oura? of? of grace.â The contradictory views of the Bible bids on the role of women and sex in spirituality, but some passages from Paul clearly indicate that witty women are not treated as equal to men. Here is an example: God is not a God of disorder but of peace. As in all the congregations of St, women should remain silent in the churches. Are not permitted to speak, but must remain in the presentation, because the law says. If they want to ask about something, they should ask their own husbands in the country, for it is shameful for a woman to speak in church. (1 14:33 of Corinthians – 35) Here is another example: In the 1 Timothy 2:11 – 15, Paul wrote that "a woman should learn in quietness and full submission. Do not allow a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, must be silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, it was the woman who was deceived and turned into the sinner. " My point is that the literal interpretation of the Bible as the only source of truth is problematic, unless one wants to bite the bullet and not critical to accept that women are less funny because it was "the woman who was deceived and transformed into the sinner. "The real source of our belief that erotic desire conflicts with spirituality is not any real conflict between the two, but rather, a conflict between patriarchal social structure and female erotic desire. I think that the more healthy, more healthy and holistic spirituality are those that erotic desire including belief in spirit without devaluing erotic energy. Sometimes this is referred to as erotic spirituality or sacred sexuality. The key is that our erotic desire is a divine gift, not a consequence of sin or falling from the god of tolerance. Forgrat: Your answer demonstrates exactly what I think is wrong with traditional views on the nature of erotic desire. As your answer shows, the notion that celibacy is more spiritual expression of the erotic is not the result of a deep truth, but rather, just a kind of manipulation bet on controlling human behavior. In short, duped by the church. It is an issue of political control, not genuine understanding spirit. Sexual desire is a form of spirit energy and efforts of political manipulators (going back thousands of years) to divorce erotic desire from spirituality introduce a kind of poison in the process of self-exploration and development of humans. Basically, our most intimate and powerful sources of spiritual development are used to handle the people in the behavior in the sense that the authorities of the church (who are not natural allies witty political essential? Of? Â of the figure) li want to behave. Temple: You gave a very insightful and has the kind of thing I was hoping for when I asked the question, namely, the opportunity to consider some connections that I could miss the contrary. Gradica the sense in which the two kingdoms brought together via touch in a broad metaphorical sense of the term. I think what you say is true: the desire of the erotic? of? â is the physical need to touch. Man, woman or? of? God.â of this is essentially what the? Of VE? AI says that for years and it is pleasing to see that others understand this idea as well. I chose to think of divinity in terms of? of? the goddess of? of? instead of the â? of? of the â? of? of the agent? of? â specifically for this reason to remember in a continuous energy erotica was divine energy and divinity can speak erotically. Extending the metaphor of touch auto-touch as well. Touch brings tangibility. The touch is vital to be. The erotic touch is essential to be given full and clearly pegged in place.